Archive for We’re Doomed
Say, How Much Does it Cost to Say, “Raise Every Tax You Can Find!”?
Posted by: | CommentsRemember how Prez. Barry set up some high-profile commission on coming up with suggestions for dealing with the $1 trillion + deficit they’re running in DC? The cynical harbored the suspicion that they were just cover for a proposal to jack of taxes big time (“Hey, the poor and disadvantaged depend on the Federal government for their basic necessities. Can you imagine a world without the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board?”).
Seems that Prez. Barry didn’t think they needed a lot of money for this, and in an act of preternatural stinginess, pretty much told them to make it up for themselves on their own Dells. Seems they’re running out of money!
President Obama’s bipartisan fiscal commission is operating on a shoestring budget and some panel members and lawmakers worry that it may run short of money.
The 18-member commission faces the daunting challenge of coming up with proposals by Dec. 1 to tame the federal government’s trillion-dollar budget deficit. But the panel’s own budget is only $500,000, barely enough to cover office rent and the salaries of four staff members.
And though the White House and Treasury have loaned the panel experts from their own payrolls, and several think tanks are helping as well, the total full-time staff currently is only about 15 people and not expected to exceed 20. Money is so tight that the commission recently abandoned hopes of holding field hearings around the country to gather views from outside of Washington.
Holy Shit! They’ve only got a staff of fifteen, and it’s not expected to exceed twenty? What’s the world coming to? How are important commissioners supposed to do anything worthwhile on chump change like that?
So let’s get this straight. The commission to study what to do about the government running out of money is running out of money. Does this get filed under “Somebody in Washington’s got a really ironic sense of humor, or they’re a complete fucking idiot. No, wait. I already know the answer to that one” or “Karma’s a Bitch, Baby”?
Economic Insanity: Counter Flooding Edition
Posted by: | CommentsBack in the day, Keyser used to write a lot about the economy. That was when the sky was falling, back in late 2008 and early 2009. Since March of last year, the stock market has regained about 50% of its losses, and seemingly the situation has been stabilized.
Seemingly.
But it’s all madness. Bernie Bernanke has “saved” the leeches at Goldman Sachs and the rest of their ilk by “buying” $1.4 trillion of their bad debts (in the form of shitty mortgages given out recklessly with fake money concocted by the Fed in the preceding half decade or so and of shitty “securities” made up out of such mortgages as a way for GS and the other scum to make more money for themselves knowingly selling this shit, a lot of which the banks wound up with). And of course, when Keyser says “buy,” that’s rather misleading. Normally, when one person buys something, that involves a transfer of funds. But the Fed has absolutely no actually wealth. It just has the ability to add a bunch of zeroes to the end of the account balances of member banks. That is, the debts haven’t been “bought” in any substantive sense of the word. Rather, they’ve been concealed with concocted money.
Oh, here’s another one. The whole purpose back in 2008 for bailing out the banks was that then they’d be able to lend. But of course they’ve done nothing of the kind. Lending is declining, along with many prices (that’s called deflation). Instead, what the banks have been doing is borrowing money from the Fed at fundamentally 0% interest (the ridiculously named ZIRP, or “zero interest rate policy”) and using that money to buy US bonds paying 3% or so. And what does the US government do with the vast amount of money it borrows in that way? Well, one thing is to prop up unsustainable levels of state and Federal government employment. And another is to stick vast sums in the Fed, which, of course, has been lending vast sums to the banks to lend to the Federal government. This must be great work if you can get it, but sooner or later, all this charade of passing non-existent wealth (that is, fiat money that represents no actual value) back and forth has got to hit a wall.
But Keyser speculated a long time ago that perhaps the worst effect of all the deficit spending might get the nitwits in Washington accustomed to the idea of spending vast amounts more than they have. That is, the US government has run deficits for years (with a minor stop in the late ’90s), but it was mainly nickels and dimes comparatively speaking. The debt would inch up all the time, but only incrementally. Now, it turns out that the Federal government can spend more than $1 trillion more than it takes in every fucking year. For a while at any rate. With China and Europe in economic chaos, the US$ seems “safe,” so that helps too. But get this. Back in Ronald Reagan’s day, the entire national debt was $1 trillion. Now they add that much to the total each year. And the other day, the total surpassed the $13 trillion mark (and no one seemed even to notice). How long can that go on? Well, we’ll see, since there seems not to be the least sign that anyone in Washington is willing to do the least bit to reduce that extravagance.
Speaking of which, the housing market is continuing to decline despite the best efforts of the Federal government to prop up the bubble. Used to be that most mortgages in the US were actually put together by that institutionalized source of fraud, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But it turns out that these days the single largest creator of mortgages is the fucking FHA. The what? Why, the Federal Housing Authority. And why’s that, you might ask? Because their standards are even lower than those of the Fannie and Freddie. That is, in order to prop up the market, the Federal government itself is active attempting to give mortgages to people who can’t afford them.
How fucking insane is that?
Oh, well, the “paper of record” (the Nude York Times) had a story the other day about how people who took out loans they shouldn’t have are now practicing “strategic defaulting.” What this means is that they’ve figured out that the banks aren’t too eager to foreclose because doing so means that the loss on the mortgage loan is realized, whereas up until that point, the banks can pretend that the loan is worth more than it is. That is, an unserviced loan looks better on the books, so the banks are dilatory about foreclosing. So the fuckers who bought some home they could never have afforded now figure that it’s okay to stick it “to the man,” so they simply don’t pay anything towards the mortgage, stay in the house, and squander the “saved” payments on vacations, and televisions and other shit! Well, it’s even better than using your house equity as an ATM. This is just flat-out theft.
And how’s all that vast amount the Federal government borrows for “stimulus” doing, anyway? Well, last month, there were 431,000 new jobs supposedly created. But the statistics are simply made up by the BEA on the basis of some sort of formula of theirs and not on actual employment facts, so it’s bullshit to begin with. But even by their reckoning, 411,000 of those were temporary census workers. So absolutely fuck-all is going on the “real” world, where people actually create wealth rather than helping find out how many illegal aliens need to be represented in Congress.
Meanwhile, Europe is totally falling apart. The European Central Bank has “bailed out” the completely irresponsible national spending in Greece with money they don’t have, and are now on the hook for Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy. The euro continues to drop, going from $1.31 to $1.20 since the great bailout. And it seems Hungary is now teetering on the brink. And the reason the ECB had to bail out Greece is not because anyone really cares about the Greeks but because all that debt the Greeks took out irresponsibly is actually held by European banks, which are really in terrible shape, but their lack of transparency makes the US situation look clear as day by comparison. This clip is humorous but sadly true:
Fundamentally, what’s going on is that in 1933 Franklin Roosevelt confiscated privately held monetary gold as part of a hare-brained scheme to end the deflation that had been going on since 1929 by devaluing the US$. Under the gold standard an ounce of gold had been worth $20.67, but after a year of playing games with the value, he settled on the tidy sum of $35, a devaluation of something like 40%. On this basis was set up the Bretton Woods system at the end of the Second World War, with the US$ serving as the world reserve currency and being itself backed by the US gold reserves. No private individual had access to this gold, but supposedly foreign central banks did. The US abused this system in the ’60s to issue more dollars than the gold could support in order to fund the Great Society and the Vietnam War on the cheap. Eventually, the French called the US bluff and asked for gold for their dollars. The US didn’t actually have that much gold, and so ended any pretense of convertibility in 1971. Richard Nixon called the French assholes for causing this. But in this instance, if anyone was acting like an asshole, it wasn’t the French.
In any event, since 1971, there has no actual value whatsoever behind any currency. It’s all paper and zeroes made up by central banks across the globe. You know, everyone takes the institution known as the “central bank” for granted, but if any group on earth should be discredited after a record of unmitigated disaster, it should be central banks. Just since 1960, you’d need three times as many dollars to have exactly the same purchasing power. That is, two thirds of the value of the currency has been inflated away in the space of 50 years. That in effect forces everyone to “invest” their money rather than keep it, which of course helps out the boys on The Street, who make money off all these transactions (apart from their ability to make more money through their insider advantage and other manipulations).
So what is the dollar based on? Well, nothing. It’s legal tender, and people have no alternative. But the currency is fundamentally based on an ongoing increase in debt. But debt has to be paid off eventually, or it’s unsustainable. You can’t just go adding on to it in the futile effort to “create” more money to service the debt. This is the basic error of confusing money and wealth. Money is merely a claim to wealth, and money created in excess of the available wealth is in the final analysis worthless.
Do you know what happens when a warship is breached on one side and begins to list? The let in water on the other side as a counterbalance. This is known as counter flooding. Now, if you didn’t do this, the ship would just keep on listing until it capsized. But counter flooding does nothing to solve the underlying problem. It simply gives you time to plug the hole and pump out the water. And if you can’t do that, then the counter flood actually makes things worse, since you’ve now got more water in the ship. It just settles more slowly on an even keel. In the meanwhile, things might seem better to someone who’s merely judging the list and not paying attention tot the freeboard (how far the deck is above water level).
Think of the stock market as being the inclinometer that registers the degree of list. Since spring of last year, they’ve open the sea cocks on the other side of the ship, so the list has decreased.
But how much lower in the water is the ship? And more importantly, will she make it back to port before foundering? There is no way to know, but the situation looks bad. And the bulkheads seem to be giving way.
God help us if they give way.
Sign of the Times: Clockwise Edition
Posted by: | CommentsYou know, Keyser was just reading a piece about how the actual fall-out from the Health Care “reform” in the US will only be known once the bureaucrats figure out what the 2000+ pages cobbled together in the middle of the night by Nancy and Harry’s aides really mean, and it occurred to him that when people complain about legislators not actually reading the bills they pass, they’re missing the point. When Congress passes some massive omnibus bullshit bill, it’s not as if they really have to get every detail right. The real purpose is to grant some executive office the authorization it needs to pass a huge slew of regulations to tell people how to run their lives. That’s the aim of all government these days, whoever is ostensibly in charge.
And then Keyser came across this image over at snarkolepsy (come for the snark and stay for the random punctuation!).
There it is, summed up in a single image. Feed the beast, starve the beast, it’s got you by the balls (metaphorical or otherwise) and is not about to let go. We’re all doomed.
And you wonder why Keyser considers himself an anarcho-libertarian?
The Cavalry is on the Way: Central Banker Edition
Posted by: | CommentsAs Greece and Portugal are set to crash the euro, a huge bubble is set to burst in China, and the massive decline in credit (which is the real source of the money supply in our fiat-currency world) keeps declining in the US, not to worry! The minions of Goldman Sachs omniscient and omnipotent heads of the world’s major central banks are set to have a little pow-wow down under:
THE world’s top central bankers began arriving in Australia yesterday as renewed fears about the strength of the global economic recovery gripped world share markets.
Representatives from 24 central banks and monetary authorities including the US Federal Reserve and European Central Bank landed in Sydney to meet tomorrow at a secret location, the Herald Sun reports.
Since they’ve done such a bang-up job presiding over the world’s economy, shifting those macro levers of monetary policy a nano-millimeter this way or a quantitative easing that way to maintain the system in perfect equilibrium, we can now rest easy with the thought that these men have set their minds to… saving the… day…
Oh, shit. We’re doomed.
What Price Goldman Sachs’ Glory?: $3 Trillion Edition
Posted by: | CommentsRemember the recent post pointing out how much of the Fed’s balance sheet now involves buying up 8 out of every 10 bonds flogged by Geithner? Well, get a load of this:
In its budget proposal to be released on Monday, the White House predicts a record $1.6 trillion budget deficit for the fiscal year that ends September 30, the Capitol Hill source said.
According to the estimate, deficits will narrow to $700 billion by fiscal 2013 before gradually rising back to $1.0 trillion by the end of the decade, the source said.
President Barack Obama will seek to strike a balance between reducing the deficit over the long term and stimulating the economy in the short term to ease the pain of double-digit unemployment.
Criticized by Republicans as a big spender, Obama used his State of the Union address last week to tell Americans he would dig the country out of a “massive fiscal hole.”
That hole is even deeper than previously believed, according to the estimate by the White House’s Office of Management and Budget.
The estimate for the current fiscal year is significantly higher than the $1.35 trillion figure forecast by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office last week.
Despite the difference, both estimates indicate that the deficit will continue to hover at a level not seen since World War Two, when measured as a percentage of the economy. Last year the government posted a $1.4 trillion deficit.
So, the US Federal government has blown through $3 trillion in the space of two fucking years? And these massive deficits stretch on as far as the eye can see? Now, to be fair, it wasn’t all borrowed for the purpose of bailing out Goldman Sachs and their unindicted coconspirators, but a big chunk of it is, either directly through the cost of restoring “liquidity” or indirectly through the vast cost of aid to the unemployed or lost tax revenue because of the bank-induced recession.
And don’t forget that this little binge comes right before all those baby boomers whose 401k’s have been ravaged by the downturn are set to become aged wards of the welfare state.
Be sure to buckle up. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
How Not to Cure a Recession the Japanese Way
Posted by: | CommentsIt was already clear back at the beginning of the year that propping up all the “too big to fail” failed financial firms would just make things worse by preventing the market from pulling back from the inflated prices of the bubble, resulting in a repetition of the Japanese “lost decade” (soon to enter its third decade). Well, the Obama boys seemed to followed the playbook of the Bush boys (otherwise known as the stooges of Goldman Sachs) in concealing the losses on Wall St. with a shower of fabricated dollars. So guess how that’s turned out?
Happy days are here again in world stock markets. Yesterday’s profit-taking notwithstanding, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is flirting with 10000 and the S&P 500 is up 60% from its March low. Still, if risk-seeking behavior has returned to financial markets, much of it is funded by borrowing increasingly cheap U.S. dollars. There is also very little evidence, if any, that consumption and employment are really recovering in America.
With the U.S. government stepping in to keep markets from clearing, today’s U.S. economy in many ways resembles the post-bubble Japanese economy of the 1990s. Ultra-loose monetary policy and low demand for credit, combined with high unemployment and consumer deleveraging, could lead to a prolonged slump.
Consumption, which still accounts for 71% of total nominal GDP in America, is still weak, and there remains little reason to expect it to pick up in a healthy fashion. Aside from the well-known and related issues of high household debt and negative equity in houses, the latest U.S. employment data have highlighted the still dismal state of the job market. Average weekly earnings of production workers rose by only 0.7% year on year in September as the average number of weekly hours worked fell to a record low of 33 hours. This marks the lowest annualized weekly earnings growth since the data series began in 1964.
Meanwhile, there’s an unhealthy reliance on government for growth in America’s increasingly command-driven economy. This is clear from the severe slump in car sales post “cash for clunkers.” U.S. auto sales declined by 35% month on month in September to an annualized 9.2 million. It’s also clear from the enormous role now played by government in the residential mortgage market. Government-guaranteed mortgages accounted for 98% of total mortgage-backed security issuance in the third quarter.
The reality of an increasingly command-driven economy in America means that government policy is likely to become the key determinant of where investors should place their money. For example, the near-term prospects for the housing market in the U.S. will be strongly influenced by whether the federal government extends its first-time home-buyer tax credit when it expires in November. Like cash for clunkers with autos, the risk is that such a program is simply buying demand from the future.
The other risk is the same as subprime mortgages—encouraging people to buy houses who may be better off renting. This is suggested from the growing delinquency rates on Federal Housing Administration (FHA) approved loans since the FHA has taken over from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as the prime way of increasing U.S. taxpayer exposure to future residential mortgage defaults. The default rate on FHA-insured mortgages was already running at 8.1% in August, up from 5.7% a year ago.
Then there’s the government involvement in the U.S. financial sector. Over the past two years the federal government is estimated to have lent, spent or guaranteed around $11 trillion to the financial sector, broadly defined. This is due to Washington’s slavish adherence to the absurd notion that financial institutions can be “too big to fail,” be they called Fannie Mae, AIG or Citicorp.
All of the above behavior invites legitimate comparisons with post-bubble Japan, where banks took years to be cleaned up as a result of regulatory forbearance. The same kind of forbearance is preventing America’s increasingly distressed commercial real-estate market from clearing. Similarly, as was the case with Japan, monetary-base growth has exploded in the U.S. over the past year courtesy of the Fed, while bank lending is declining. This is why there is every reason to fear that America is already in a Japanese-style liquidity trap.
Keyesr’s been reading a certain amount about the 1930s, and you’ll never guess what the cause of the length and severity of the Great Depression was. Not, as the Friedmanian monetarists including Greenspan’s epigone Bernanke would have it, the failure of the Fed to provide “liquidity.” Quite the contrary. Starting with Hoover, there was a concerted effort to prop up inflated prices and to prevent wages from reducing to a sustainable level. Looks like we’re set to have a replay of exactly the same false policies. Whether you want to consider it a repeat of Japan in the ’90s or the US in the ’30s, it looks like this is shaping up to be an L-shaped “recovery.”
As Jack Dawson (or was it Han Solo?) would say, this doesn’t look good.
British Economic Analysis: “Are We Fooked?” Edition
Posted by: | CommentsAnother one of those busy days. So here’s bit of insightful economic analysis from “across the pond” for the further enlightenment of Keyser’s loyal readers.
Say, they don’t have Republicans over there, so what is that elephant?
Another Snapshot of “Green Shoots” Withering on the Vine
Posted by: | CommentsChrist, look at this graph comparing unemployment statistics in recessions since the end of the Second World War. So, the talking heads say the worst is behind us and prosperity is just around thecorner, do they? Well, click on the graph (based on statistics as of July and released in August, courtesy of Calculated Risk, where you can find lots of other harrowing graphics) for a larger version and see what you think.
Post scriptum. Now that Keyser thinks about it, “withering on the vine” is a false image. There were no green shoots in the first place, and only an idiot would say otherwise. Kudlow, Cramer? Anyone?









